On January 15 2010, in San Jose California, a repossession inccident occured. Isabel Leuvano left her car parked in her ex-husband's driveway waiting outside to pick up her daughter, while Alberto Luna jumped in the running car and drove off. Alberto Luna, owner of Alberto's Auto Sales, repossessed the car due to Isabel being behind in her payments. Little did he know that her 2-year-old son was sleeping in the back seat.
An hour and a half later police officers found the child, the same time that Luna realized that there was a child in the car. No kiddnapping charges were made. In some ways this viloates the right to privacy and tresspassing. However, there is no law in California that states a repossession has to take place in a public place or that they have to give warning before hand.
Privacy was violated becuase Luna had to know where to find Isabel outside of her own home. He had to be watching her to know her schedule, to know where she would be at certain times of the day. He also had to be following her. As for tresspassing, Luna did take the car on private property. What do you think? Were privacy issues and tresspassing an issue here?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment